By: Gil delos Santos
Reading through the latest issue of Boracay Sun (August–September 2025), I cannot help but reflect on how diverse Boracay has become in terms of demographics. Yet, this diversity feels alienating at times. On crucial issues that shape the island’s future, I ask myself: where are the voices of my fellow Boracaynon community members? Who represents us? Who speaks for our sentiments?
Now, in an island where true Boracaynons have become a minority—outnumbered and often overshadowed in representation and decision-making—I cannot help but wonder: tunay nga Boracaynons sa isip, sa salita, at sa gawa, diin ron kamo?
I may be labeled conservative, even a hopeless romantic, for longing for the old Boracay. But if you have not truly lived and breathed how this island once was, you may never understand the depth of our yearning for its lost soul.
I hold the highest respect for every industry player in Boracay and am grateful for the contributions that have shaped the island’s growth. But I cannot respect abuse and greed disguised as “care for the island.” We are not blind. Business is business, and profit often comes before principle. That is why I ask: when speaking for Boracay, speak only for yourself, for your own group, and for your own interests. Do not claim to speak for Boracay as a whole.
If you are a business owner, do not speak as if for tourists.
If you are an employer, do not speak as if for workers.
If you are a resident, make sure it is the consensus of residents.
There is dignity in honesty, even if it hurts others.
And so, with respect to the arguments in favor of the Boracay Bridge, I humbly present my counterpoints:
1. Accessibility to titled lands in the Mainland for housing — With or without a bridge, the Mainland is already accessible 24/7.
2. Passengers stranded during typhoons — This should be seen as an opportunity to spread tourism to Mainland accommodations. Besides, when typhoons hit, flights are suspended anyway—meaning no flights are actually “missed.”
3. Rising commodity prices and health services — A bridge does not guarantee lower prices, as tolls and costs will offset any supposed savings. The real solution to healthcare is a proper medical facility on the island. For emergencies, extending travel to Kalibo could even worsen outcomes.
4. Mainland housing to improve local lives — Which locals are we really talking about? True Boracaynon families want to remain in Boracay. As for new migrants, housing development on the Mainland is already possible—with or without a bridge.
Outside these arguments, let it be clear: we stand for the right to express our convictions. This is not personal—it is a counterreaction for what we believe is in the best interest of Boracaynons, the original stewards of this island.
BRIDGE UPDATE:
1. Recent surprise — in 2018, Malay LGU (office of the mayor) issued a Letter of No Objection to SMC, enabling DPWH to pursue PPP arrangements.
2. Malay LGU recently expressed dissatisfaction upon learning that the bridge activity hub will be installed in Nabas, not in Malay.
3. As of June 2025, SB Malay has issued a resolution removing the bridge from the municipality’s CLUP and AIP.
Comments
Post a Comment